Football
Betting Column: Pinnacle Pulse
In earlier columns we've
discussed the effect of discounted vigorish
on major sports. This week, I'd like to take
a closer look at proposition bets. A proposition
(or prop bet) is simply a wager on something
other than a game spread or total. It can cover
anything from which of two batters will get
more hits, to who will win the next Heisman
trophy. Proposition wagers are typically available
on any major sport.
Why should you bother with propositions?
The answer is simple - these are the easiest
for a player to beat. Most bettors will be shocked
to learn this, but sports books routinely lose
money on props and oftentimes a break-even day
is considered a small victory.
When you see a spread on an NFL game, that
spread is the result of at least a dozen separate
odds makers whose collective opinion is merged
to form the market. When you wager on a proposition,
it's typically your opinion versus one odds
maker. If you know more than that one odds maker,
you are going to get the best of it.
Sports books know that propositions are dangerous.
Many try to protect themselves by using 30 or
40 cent lines with low wagering limits. Some
will even force prop players to mix their action
by playing regular lines as a condition of continued
proposition wagering. Many professional players
will confirm this – for the smaller players,
betting on props is one of the best ways to
win long-term. And by playing at low juice,
the odds will be even more in your favor.
At PinnacleSports.com we use a 16 cent line
on props, which offers up to 60% greater value
than other books. With hundreds of propositions
to choose from including props on every major
sport as well as fantasy football player match-ups,
reality TV shows, poker tournaments and even
the World Chess Championships, there is literally
something for everyone.
Why do sports books continue offering props?
At Pinnacle Sports we have noticed two things
that make props worth offering: 1) new players
drawn by props never leave after trying the
rest of the site; and 2) prop players branch
out to the rest of our discount-priced wagering
like on the games below, which have seen interesting
betting patterns early in the week.
Florida (-4 +106) at Alabama
Urban Meyer has won his last 20 games as a
head coach, a streak beginning on November 1,
2003 while coaching Utah. He hopes to earn his
fifth win this season leading the Gators into
Tuscaloosa. This match-up features two of the
strongest defenses in the country; Florida allowing
232.5 yds/game, and Alabama permitting 223 yds/game.
Beware the early money, as it is usually sharp.
This game was no exception with regular sharps
all over Alabama early. This opened at Alabama
+4 +105, and was bet down to +4 -116 (or +3.5
-110). We are seeing some opposition at -4 -101,
but we are unsure which way this game will head
closer to the weekend.
Notre Dame (+3) at Purdue
Weis's Irish have opened up their offense,
averaging 295 passing yards per game, and 475
total yards per game. Notre Dame has not generated
that much offense in any of the last 10 years.
Purdue has pursued a more balanced attack, averaging
218 passing yards, and 210 rushing yards per
game. Both defenses seem soft and each allows
roughly 300 yards per game. Statistics are a
dangerous tool to use for odds making in NCAA
football, especially in the early season. Statistics
get distorted when a high tier team plays down
(like Notre Dame against Pittsburgh and Washington,
or Purdue versus Akron).
We opened this game at Purdue -1.5. Around
5:00pm on Sunday, other books opened at Purdue
-3.5.The sharp players moved in like vultures,
picking off the gap. Able to take Purdue -1.5
-105 and Notre Dame +3.5 at other books, the
market squeezed to a neutral point around -2.5
/ -3. Due to our opener, a majority of the early
money was on Purdue. Once the price stabilized,
we were still seeing sharp action on Purdue
at -2.5/-109 and -3/+107.
Dallas (+3) at Oakland
The Raiders are 0-3 after losing competitive
games to New England, Philadelphia and Kansas
City. Oakland is still favored at home though
against the 2-1 Cowboys. Dallas struggled to
win last week against San Francisco, scoring
two 4th quarter TD's to win 34-31.
Games lined on a "3" are both interesting
and frightening for a line manager. We opened
the game at +3 +105, and are seeing the sharper
players divided on this game. Raiders backers
are using point buy/selling to play -2.5, -3
and -3.5. We have other professional players
on Dallas +3 and +3.5 but none are selling down
to +2.5. If the game lands on the "3",
we end up paying wagers on both sides of the
game.
Indianapolis (-7) at Tennessee
Indianapolis disappointed its backers last
week. After getting first and goal from the
Cleveland 7 with 88 seconds left, Indianapolis
knelt on the ball 3 times. This secured an injury-free
win for the Colts and a loss for those betting
Indianapolis at -13.5 last week. The Colts defense
has played well allowing only 16 points the
entire season. Meanwhile, Tennessee has had
offensive problems, managing only four offensive
touchdowns in three games.
We opened this game at -6.5 flat, and all the
early action was on the Colts. When it was bet
down to -6.5 -109, we started to get money trickling
in on the dog, mostly bought up to +7. For now,
we are siding with the dog bettors and accepting
Colts money by holding our price. As with all
games lined on the "3" and "7",
we are seeing a lot of point buying through
the key number.
San Diego at New England O/U 47
This year, games with these two teams have
averaged 49 points per game. It is early in
the season though, and team statistics tend
to revert somewhat towards the mean.
We opened this with a total of 45 and were
flooded with over money at a ratio of eight
wagers on the over for every one accepted on
the under. Even after we moved to 47, there
is still upward pressure as part of the market
is trading at 47.5. Those who played over 45
got great value, but how much? The 45 hits about
3% of the time; the 46 hits 1.5% and the 47
hits 3% of the time. Therefore over 45 should
win a little over 55% of the time. Thanks to
-105 pricing, those early sharps netted at least
an 8% theoretical yield on their bets.
|