Responsibility
for Losses - the House Edge or YOU?
My wife, the beautiful A.P.,
and I walk three to six miles just about every
morning. We love this time, just as the sun
rises, to talk, to think, to reflect together.
Today A.P. asked, "What percent of responsibility
do you take for where you are now, for your
lot in life, for how everything turned out?"
I
thought a second, and then said, "I take
100 percent responsibility for my life. I couldn't
choose my birth, of course, but I always made
choices, even as a child, some turned out good,
some bad. Even in situations that were accidents,
or when confronted by something not of my own
making, or having to deal with the decisions
of others, it was up to me to see my way around
these things, handle these things. So who and
what I am, I am responsible for. What about
you?"
"One
hundred percent," she said. "One hundred
percent."
Then
we discussed people we knew and whether they
were the type who took responsibility for their
own lives or the type to blame others for their
misfortunes and look to the outside for help
with this or that situation. We both knew two
men, now in their 50s, who had made messes of
their lives and were now convinced it was the
"capitalist" system that put them
where they were. Interestingly enough, these
individuals grew up in privilege, parents both
college-educated, suburban schooling, never
a day when they had to work in their childhoods
- a real contrast certainly to my childhood
which was anything but privileged. (Interesting
aside: 90 percent of the people in the top 1
percent income bracket were born into families
in the bottom 10 percent!)
These
men, as boys, had made choices to use drugs,
cut school, drop out and become fringe dwellers,
always looking for the easy way to get through
whatever hand life dealt them. They worked hardest
at not working hard. Now, graying and gaunt,
they both are looking for a "communist
revolution" to destroy the ruling class,
which they identify as A.P. and me, and give
them the money and goods that others had worked
for. They wanted free medical, free dental,
free rent (they called it "affordable"
rent) and welfare, which they called euphemistically
"redistribution of wealth." In short,
the decisions they made that landed them where
they were, well, these decisions were irrelevant
to them - they blamed the "system"
and literally wanted other people, who had made
something of their lives, to support them. In
short, fined-edged, they were and are losers
who took no responsibility for their losses.
And,
as I always do, I tried to find analogies in
casino gambling. Such analogies weren't hard
to come by. I thought of all the players I have
seen at hundreds, no, thousands of blackjack
tables where I've played, players who blamed
the dealers when they lost, players who fumed
and barked, like chained dogs when no one had
chained them to the table to play. Once at the
Golden Nugget in downtown Las Vegas, I saw an
impeccably dressed man - a surgeon no less -
deliberately knock over his drink, then take
the towel out of the hands of the dealer who
was attempting to clean up the mess, throw it
in her face and then, completely unhinged, this
surgeon pushed over the table and just started
babbling like a maniac.
I've
seen craps players curse shooters who have sevened-out
early. I've seen craps players muttering over
and over about how poorly a session was going
and how unfair that was to them. I've even seen
craps players curse out players who have sevened-out
after half-hour rolls! Why? Because these craps
players had bet in such a way that they needed
even longer rolls to make money.
I've
seen a dozen men, and two women, actually hit
slot machines with their fists, hard, because
they lost all their money. (One guy even broke
a knuckle.) I saw another guy at Showboat in
Atlantic City, kick a machine time and again
until an ancient security guard hobbled over
and said, "Sonny, the machine didn't steal
your money, you gave it to it." Indeed.
So,
as a serious casino player who is reading a
magazine for serious casino players, I ask you
this: Is it the house edge that is responsible
for your losses at casino gambling or are you
strictly and solely responsible for every penny
you have lost at the tables or machines?
My
answer is that you are unquestionably 100 percent
responsible for everything. Yes, the casino
structures its games to give itself an edge
on just about every bet there is. Sometimes
this edge is small; sometimes it's large. Yes,
every slot machine is programmed to return less
money than is put in it. A mathematician might
say it is the house edge that is responsible
for our losses. Emotionally overwrought and/or
superstitious players might blame the "lucky
dealer" or "bad dice" for their
fate. But I say, nonsense to these excuses,
because excuses they are.
We
are solely responsible for what we do and for
the consequences of our choices.
We
know when we enter a casino that the games are
created in such a way as to make our chances
of winning in the long run remote. We know there
is a house edge, even if we might not know exactly
what that expression means in mathematical terms.
We know that it means in general terms - we
lose; casino wins! We know that when and how
much we bet; how long we stay at the games;
how often we go to casinos are all our choice.
We know that no one is forcing us to gamble,
nor is any force, outside compulsory agency,
be it a deity, or demon mucking around with
our free will to say, "Yes, I will make
this bet, play that game for this long or until
that outcome," or "No, I will not
make this bet, play that game, because - I'm
done for the day."
And
we know another thing: We have chosen casino
gambling as our thrill ride. We want the ups
and downs; we choose to go on the roller coaster.
No one chooses this for us. You might hear some
critics of casino gambling rail that the casinos
make it easy for people to lose their cool and
go overboard. But that's like blaming the buffet
for a person who overeats. The buffet didn't
make me fat. I made me fat. The casino is a
buffet of bets. You choose which ones to taste
and you are responsible for their slimming effects
on your bankroll.
As
Shakespeare had Caesar so aptly put it: "The
fault, dear Brutus, lies not in our stars but
in ourselves."
|