Top Casinos Guide featuring list of Top Online
Casinos, Online Casino Payouts and recommendations for how to pay at top
online casinos.
Gambling News by House of Odds
Saturday, March 31, 2007
Anti-gambling Groups Want A Slowdown On March Madness
Anti-gambling groups are asking companies to take it easy during March Madness. Some researchers say companies could make someone who is addicted to gambling relapse. Let's face it. Very few of us actually do really well with our NCAA college basketball brackets. David Letterman must have really taken a pounding this year. "My prediction, in the final it will be Butler University and Weber State," Letterman said. Of course, Letterman was kidding. After all, UCLA is a lock this Saturday. But, even if I really believed that, some people say you should not bet on them to make the final. In fact, they are saying you should not bet at all. Institute of Change Operations Director Frank Roberts said, "I don't think there would ever be a 'sure thing.' There's still an element of risk, there." Roberts says just the act of participating in a tournament bracket won't turn you into a problem gambler. But, anti-gambling groups are asking companies not to take that chance. "It's the illusion of control that's operating in the brain," Roberts said. A new study by Bensinger, Dupont & Associates says more people look for help to stop their sports gambling during March and April, at the height of March Madness. Roberts says he's treated many clients for gambling addiction, and they all say it started with something small, even by an office pool. "Yeah, it can be even smaller than that. One's own triggers are kind of unique to themselves," Roberts told KSL Newsradio. There are other risks to the companies involved. Researchers say companies can be sued by employees for any financial losses if the company started the betting pool. Also, the BDA survey says productivity goes down, and 10 percent of workers have called in sick to see a sporting event. Plus, they say betters are more likely to borrow money from their coworkers. Roberts says gamblers think they'll be able to pay of their debts after they win. "It's not going to work, but, yet, the person of addiction continues to be in what we call denial, or uses defense mechanisms to continue to convince themselves that, 'I can make it work,'" Roberts said. In fact, Roberts says one of the worst things that could happen to a gambling addict is to win. "The winning would perpetuate the denial and defense mechanisms that one is using," Roberts said. Roberts says the cases of someone becoming addicted to gambling are relatively rare, and usually someone is only triggered by March Madness if they're already at risk. However, the National Council on Problem Gambling says four million to eight million people could be considered problem gamblers every year, and two million can be classified as pathological gamblers.
After a 13-hour filibuster, gambling proponents found the Senate votes they needed early today to expand casino gaming across the state. Following speeches that dragged late into Wednesday night, the Senate voted 21-19 - the minimum needed for passage - just after midnight to allow casinos in Sedgwick and three other counties and as many as 2,800 slot machines at horse and dog racetracks, including Wichita Greyhound Park. Key swing votes were cast by Sens. Jean Schodorf, R-Wichita, and Greta Goodwin, D-Winfield. Schodorf has voted against gambling for her seven years as a lawmaker, but said she switched because "I believe strongly, so strongly, in the people's right to vote." Goodwin, a longtime opponent of gambling, told The Eagle on Monday that she planned to vote against expanded gambling because of the potential social costs. She was on the Senate floor and not available for comment early today. Chamber of commerce interests in Goodwin's district strongly supported the bill, which offers a chance that a casino could go to Sumner County if Sedgwick County voters don't want one. Under the bill's provisions, Sedgwick County voters must decide in a special election before the end of the year. Sumner County voters have already said yes to a casino. Regardless of whether the casino ends up in Sedgwick County or Sumner County, both will share in the revenue. Gambling opponents, who had been confident of victory early in the day, said they were dismayed. "What we've done is given away the farm," said Sen. Susan Wagle, R-Wichita, who thinks the state could get more from casino developers than the $25æmillion license fee the bill specifies. She also pointed out that the bill had never been put to a public hearing. "This is a poorly written bill, written behind closed doors." In a political drama the Statehouse hasn't seen in decades, gambling proponents tied up the floor for hours in a desperate fight to keep a House-passed gambling bill alive. Opponents bided their time and waited for the proponents to run out of things to say. Meanwhile, in the House, Speaker Melvin Neufeld, a gambling opponent, sequestered himself in his office, declining to appoint members of a conference committee - an action that could have brought the extended Senate debate to a close.
That left House members sitting in their seats hour after hour, waiting for either the senators to stop talking or their speaker to let them appoint conferees.
Longtime members said it was the longest filibuster they could remember - exceeding a legendary six-hour speech on taxation that then-Rep. Kerry Patrick delivered in 1988.
With hundreds of millions of dollars on the line, the issue emerged as the most controversial bill to cross legislators' desks this session.
It passed the House about 2:30 a.m. Saturday, sending it to the Senate.
Wednesday began with a series of parliamentary maneuvers as gambling supporters tried to ward off attempts to kill the bill.
First, Sen. John Vratil, R-Leawood and Sen. Pete Brungardt, R-Salina, teamed up to control the Senate floor and force a vote to appoint a conference committee -three senators and three House members who could negotiate a final bill for both houses.
Sen. Phil Journey, R-Haysville, spoke for 25 minutes against sending the bill to conference. At the time, his fellow legislators thought it was lengthy.
The motion eventually passed 22-18.
But immediately after that vote, Sens. Jim Barnett, R-Emporia, and Wagle teamed up to engineer a vote to kill the gambling bill.
That action launched the filibuster.
Across the Capitol rotunda, House members sat in their seats and stewed - unable to do anything but unable to leave without giving potential advantage to their opponents if the logjam were to break.
They read and played solitaire or listened to basketball games on their desk computers.
By 10 p.m., tempers were starting to fray.
"This is dumb," said Rep. Dale Swenson, R-Wichita. "There's no reason for the House to even be here. There's no strategy to this."
Indianapolis Metropolitan Police raided another alleged gambling house Tuesday, this time on the city's northeast side. "I'm not robbing, killing or stealing. I am working to feed my kids that's all I'm doing," said suspect Rodney Wallace. But metro police say what 49-year-old Wallace was doing is illegal. Police arrested Wallace and two others, 51-year-old William Clinkscales and 51-year-old Clarence Michael Johnson. "Come down here bust in on us the way they did stepping all over people and I think that's ridiculous, it wasn't called for," said Johnson. "All that wasn't called for. It's like they were looking for a mass murderer or something. That's ridiculous." Police say a tip from neighbors led them to what looks like a run down house in the 3700 block of North Keystone. But they say this is a gambling house called "The Shack" that is wired with video surveillance equipment. "I go there every day, every day. Shake, I'm there every time. It's how I pay my rent when I don't go to work. It's how I pay my rent, it's how my kids get clothes on their back," said Steve Fields. Police gathered evidence from inside the house while some admitted patrons of the gambling house watched from the parking lot. "There people out here that sell drugs and get misdemeanor charges, but you get caught in there it's a felony for what? We ain't doing. Nothing. We ain't shoot nobody and we don't hurt nob ody nothing. It's just an honest living you know what I'm saying," Fields said. This is the fifth gambling house IMPD officers have raided in the past couple of months. "We are going to continue to do everything we can to shut these things down," said IMPD Sgt. Matthew Mount. Clinkscales and Wallace were arrested on preliminary charges of promoting professional gambling, a D felony, unlawful gambling, a B misdemeanor and maintaining a dive, an A misdemeanor. Johnson was arrested on preliminary charges of promoting professional Gambling, a D felony, and illegal gambling, a B misdemeanor. "This is a job. This is a job. I've got to work just like you've got to work," Wallace said.
A former Merrill Lynch & Co. broker was arrested on state gambling charges in New York, postponing his federal trial for selling access to trading information broadcast over his firm's office intercom. Sign up for: Globe Headlines e-mail | Breaking News Alerts Timothy O'Connell, 42, of Carle Place, N.Y., was one of 17 people charged yesterday in connection with an alleged $30 million online sports gambling ring, Kevin Ryan, a spokesman for the Queens district attorney, said. "He was a runner," said Ryan. "He was responsible for soliciting new bettors to the operation, maintaining the relationship with bettors, and meeting with bettors to collect gambling losses and pay out winnings." O'Connell's arrest brought his trial in Brooklyn, N.Y., federal court to a halt this morning. U S District Judge I. Leo Glasser later adjourned the case for the day. The trial will resume today. O'Connell is one of seven defendants charged with conspiring to trade on information broadcast over internal "squawk boxes" at top Wall Street firms. He and brokers at Citigroup Inc. and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. allowed day traders at A.B. Watley Group Inc., an online brokerage, to eavesdrop on large institutional orders, according to prosecutors.
Senate President Pro Tem David Long said Wednesday that he plans to expand his proposal to crack down on illegal gambling, suggesting that the state should add a special prosecutor just to handle those cases. Long, R-Fort Wayne, said too many county prosecutors view illegal gambling -- particularly by bars, clubs and other retailers using video machines with names such as Cherry Master -- as not worth pursuing. A state prosecutor based at the Indiana Gaming Commission could solve that problem, he said. "The number of these machines in the state has exploded," Long said. "I think we need to do something about it. We need to draw a line in the sand." The Senate Rules Committee, which Long chairs, already is considering his proposal to provide nearly $2 million to fund 25 excise police officers dedicated to investigating illegal gambling and increase the criminal penalties for people charged a second time with promoting professional gambling. It also would authorize the state to revoke lottery contracts, retail merchant permits and state licenses for the sale of tobacco and alcohol for any companies or organizations found with illegal gambling machines. The proposal will be considered as an amendment to House Bill 1510, which makes changes to the state's charity gambling legislation, when the Rules Committee reconvenes Monday. Long, one of two senators pushing the plan, said that he has enough votes in the committee and perhaps the Senate to approve the proposal. In the House, however, support is unclear. House Speaker Pat Bauer, D-South Bend, said he is uncomfortable creating a state prosecutor and prefers to leave illegal gambling investigations to local law enforcement. But he said that Gov. Mitch Daniels has made the problem a state issue by sending excise police officers who regulate alcohol establishments in search of video gambling machines. "We may have to take a look at some of these ideas," Bauer said. Long said he's still working on details, but the state prosecutor would take cases from excise officers and other law enforcement from across the state. The cases likely would be filed in Marion County. Sen. Vi Simpson, who serves on the Senate Rules Committee, said that she's unsure how to vote on Long's overall proposal. She supports legalizing and regulating video gambling machines for bars and fraternal clubs but said if lawmakers don't do that, the state should enforce the law it has. "I plan to spend my weekend at VFWs and American Legion posts to see how they feel about this," Simpson said. "Cherry Masters in certain areas of the state support the charitable causes of these service clubs. I want to make sure the bill does enough to help them so they can continue those activities."
The Kansas House of Representatives passed a bill this week allowing casinos and slot machines. Lawmakers are betting that gaming will be a cash cow for the state. If you listen to supporters, "destination" casinos will attract people from around the region, and their money will boost the state and local economies. That's enough to sway many legislators. What they're not looking enough at, though, is how much the increased revenue will cost their constituents. According to a 2004 study by GVA Marquette Advisors for the Wichita Downtown Development Corp. and the Greater Wichita Convention and Visitors Bureau, most participants of a casino in Sedgwick County would live within a 50-mile radius of Wichita and would provide 75 percent of the revenue. That money would likely come at the expense of other local businesses. A study of gambling in Iowa by Loretta Fairchild and Amy Stickney of Nebraska Wesleyan University and Jonathan Krutz of the Nebraska Hospice Association showed that gambling has adverse effects on local economies. Midsize Iowa cities that had casinos had an average growth of 0.7 percent, while cities that didn't have casinos grew 3.4 percent. Another troubling aspect of casinos is ownership. Even though private entities would run them, Kansas would be the only state to own casinos. What place does the state have owning a business that offers so much collateral social damage? The bill would allot 2 percent of an estimated $200 million in revenue for addiction treatment. That's $4 million for the Sedgwick County area, and the money would go first to Topeka, not the local area. That's a skimpy budget considering the projected social cost. The 2004 local study estimated that between 1 percent and 1.5 percent of adults "are susceptible to becoming a pathological gambler." Projected on the metropolitan Wichita area, that means that 5,000 to 8,000 people may become addicted.
The study estimated the social cost at $13,586 for each person, with an annual burden on the community ranging from $71 million to $106 million. In spite of these estimates, the study concluded that "while this community social burden could be significant, its quantified estimate is still surpassed by the positive economic impacts measured in this study."
That is a hard sell to families of the addicted.
A study in 2004 by Christiansen Capital Advisors for Harrah's found that 26 percent of players were contributing 82 percent of the profit. A similar study commissioned by the state of Connecticut in 1997 found that nearly one-third of gamblers interviewed at casinos were problem gamblers.
In other words, the industry feeds on addiction.
During the House debate, a tearful Rep. Anthony Brown, R-Eudora, recounted the toll a gambling addiction took on a close relative. He convinced casino supporters to add an amendment to ban the use of credit cards or ATMs within the casinos and impose a weekly loss limit of $500.
But when the same legislators realized the restrictions might jeopardize efforts to attract casino operators, they regrouped and removed the amendment.
The Senate is now preparing to debate the bill, which Gov. Kathleen Sebelius supports. But let's hope the appeal of fast cash from casinos won't blind legislators and Kansans to their negative effects.
Three of four West Virginia racetracks aim to have voters decide June 9 whether to allow table games in their slots-only casinos, but executives say the timing of votes in Hancock, Ohio and Kanawha counties is more about urgency than strategy. "I don't think it was really organized. It's just the first available day we could get,'' Bob Marshall, president of Wheeling Island Racetrack & Gaming Center, said Tuesday. There will, however, likely be some advertising coordination between Marshall's Ohio County operation and the nearby Mountaineer Racetrack & Gaming Resort in Chester. "We would certainly not want to confuse the media market,'' Marshall said, predicting the launch of what both tracks call a public education campaign by the end of April. But a conservative Christian activist group hoping to stop the referenda says the simultaneous votes are more than coincidence; they are an effort to divide and conquer the opposition. "I didn't ride in on a turnip truck, I can assure you,'' said Kevin McCoy, executive director of the West Virginia Family Foundation. "They know what they're doing. They know our resources are limited, both in personnel and financial,'' he said. "I see this as a way to get us off balance, to keep us from being able to organize effectively in those counties.'' Opponents of gambling would have stood a better chance of defeating table games if a vote had been held statewide, McCoy said. But the bill Gov. Joe Manchin signed last week gave only voters in Hancock, Ohio, Kanawha and Jefferson counties the right to decide whether their racetracks should become full-blown casinos. After pushing for years to get blackjack, poker and other games legalized, the owners of West Virginia's tracks are eager to confront growing competition from Pennsylvania's new slot parlors by offering something fresh. Wheeling Island, a subsidiary of Delaware North Companies of Buffalo, N.Y., and Mountaineer, owned by MTR Gaming Group Inc., face the most immediate pressure. But two other tracks also stand to benefit -- Tri-State Racetrack and Gaming Center in Nitro, owned by Michigan-based Hartman & Tyner Inc., and the Charles Town Races & Slots, owned by Penn National Gaming Inc. of Wyomissing, Pa. Track owners can either have the question placed on a 2008 primary or general election ballot or seek a special election this year at their own expense. Election costs range from $30,000 to $250,000, according to clerks in the host counties.
Only Charles Town, which has a healthier economy, a booming population and no immediate threat of competition, has yet to set a date for a vote. John Finamore, vice president of regional operations for Penn National, could not immediately be reached for comment Tuesday.
But Daniel Adkins, vice president of Tri-State's parent company, said the three tracks that are moving quickly all "just want to go sooner rather than later.''
Though there have been no formal discussions yet, he said it's likely the tracks will find some way to pool their resources for the months ahead.
"We're right now putting the pieces together,'' Adkins said, so it will be several more weeks before Tri-State starts to call press conferences and advertise.
Though Mountaineer has requested and will likely get a June 9 election date, Mountaineer spokeswoman Tamara Cronin said the Hancock County Commission won't vote on the request until April 5.
"Each county is unique as far as how they handle their elections and voters, so I think it's an individual decision,'' she said of the simultaneous dates.
"When it comes right down to it, this is something we're going to handle as we do all elections here,'' she said. "All politics is local, and this is going to be about getting to each and every voter.''
Turnout on election day will be key, and that's where the track's 1,500 employees come in.
"I believe the people who will get this passed are our employees,'' Cronin said, "because they're the ones who are impacted.''
But the West Virginia Family Foundation is determined to stop the votes by seeking a court-ordered injunction in one or more counties.
McCoy said he believes table games as part of the state's lottery system are unconstitutional. The lawsuit he intends to file may also challenge gambling on moral grounds.
"We're not going to allow a vote,'' he vowed. "We will take whatever action is necessary to stop it.''
An odd combination of gambling opponents and supporters stalled legislation early today that would repeal Missouri's unique gamblers' loss limit in an attempt to generate tax revenues for college scholarships. Missouri law currently prohibits casino patrons from buying more than $500 in slot-machine tokens or table-game chips every two hours - the nation's only such betting cap. Senate legislation would remove the loss limit - resulting in a projected 17 percent revenue increase for casinos - while imposing an additional 1 percent state tax on the top tier of casino revenues. The bill also would cap the number of casinos in Missouri. A legislative financial analysis predicts the bill could generate as much as $113 million annually in additional state casino taxes, which would fund new college scholarships for Missouri high school graduates. Senators remained in session until almost 4 a.m. this morning, finally setting the bill aside after attacks both from gambling foes opposed to the loss limit repeal and from casino supporters objecting to a limit on the number of casinos. Disagreement also emerged over the size of the proposed tax increase on casino income. Senate Majority Leader Charlie Shields, the bill's sponsor, said he wouldn't bring the bill back for debate until at least some of the differences could be resolved through private negotiations. Missourians approved casino gambling in 1992 for boats along the Mississippi and Missouri rivers. That ballot measure included the $500 loss limit. But casinos - and the Missouri Gaming Commission that oversees them - have lobbied for years to repeal the loss limit on grounds it puts Missouri at a competitive disadvantage, especially with neighboring casino states such as Illinois. Supporters of the repeal also argue the loss limits have done little to deter problem gamblers. Adding to the pressure to repeal Missouri's loss limits is a potential increase in competition from Kansas, where the House recently passed legislation to expand casino gambling - most notably, in the Kansas City area. That bill still must make it through the Kansas Senate. Shields, St. Joseph Republican, is touting the Missouri bill more for its educational opportunities than its economic competition with out-of-state casinos. The new Smart Start Scholarships could be used at both public or private colleges. Their amount would be set by the Department of Higher Education based on the number of applicants and the total amount of money available. Shields estimates that each high school graduate could get $2,000 spread over two years of college.
But others argue that it's not worth reversing the will of voters.
Sen. Chuck Purgason, of Caulfield, said fellow Republicans - many of whom fought the repeal of loss limits in the past - were following a "path of stupidity" in now supporting the limits' repeal. He claimed colleagues were bowing to potential campaign contributions from the casino industry.
"What we're doing here is just reneging on the deal," Purgason said. "What this is about is raising money for the next election by listening to the outside interests rather than the people who voted on this at home."
Senators defeated, 23-10, Purgason's amendment that would have referred the legislation to statewide voters. They also voted down, 21-12, an amendment that would have raised the 1 percent casino tax increase to 2 percent - on top of current 20 percent tax on casinos' adjusted gross receipts.
The bill would limit Missouri to 13 casinos, essentially preventing a further expansion of gambling boats beyond those already in place or being developed. It also stipulates that any future casino licenses could only be awarded in the same city or county as where an existing casino closes.
Senators defeated by a 17-11 vote an amendment by Sen. Tim Green, St. Louis Democrat, that would have set the casino cap at 18 facilities.
Betting is drawing attention in the wake of Bob Woolmer's murder. Even as speculation is rife that the betting biggies could have been behind the crime, www.cricketworldcuplatest.com informs that the Jamaica sleuths are yet to find any evidence regarding match-fixing and betting in Woolmer's laptop. How big is the betting industry? A Las Vegas-datelined report on http://abcnews.go.com cites PricewaterhouseCoopers' forecast - that global revenue from gambling is expected to climb 8.8 percent annually 'to $125 billion by 2010'. However, according to estimates of Global Betting & Gaming Consultants (GBGC) posted in a dated story on www.out-law.com, gross turnover for the global gambling industry should be well over $1,000 billion annually, with a gross profit rate of about 20 per cent. GBGC is of the view that the UK could become the centre of global gambling; because "the UK has long been a role model for integrity and regulation in the gambling sector." To know about the UK laws that apply to betting, Business Line contacted Jeff Rodwell, Partner in Reed Smith Richards Butler LLP, an international law firm based in London. Here's Jeff, taking on a few questions on betting. What is law on betting in the UK? The current legislation governing the licensing of bookmaking in the UK is the Betting, Gaming & Lotteries Act 1963 as amended by the Gaming Act 1968. They provide for the licensing of bookmakers and premises used for bookmaking. The Gambling Act 2005 is partially in effect and is being phased in over time. The licensing provisions of the Gambling Act 2005 come into effect on September 1, 2007. Who can apply for a licence? The criteria under both the existing and new licensing regimes are similar with bookmakers being required to show good character, financial viability and industry knowledge. Both regimes also control the use of advertising for any licensed bookmaker and prohibit advertising for any person not so licensed. Bookmakers with a licence under the current statute still have to apply for a licence under the new regime. The period for application for a licence to be granted from September 1, 2007 has already closed but new licences can be applied for and granted after the current applications (mostly existing bookmakers) have been reviewed. On online gambling. Traditionally of course, bookmaking has been done with a physical presence at the race track or a betting office situated off-track. Over the last 2 years the volume and value of remote gambling through the Internet or mobile phones has increased substantially. Both the existing and the new statute provide for licensing in the UK of remote gambling operations, although this is addressed more directly in the new statute. Are these operations commercially successful? In the past there has been little commercial interest in UK registration of remote gambling sites because of the significant tax imposed on the turnover or profits of the remote sites. Most of the gambling websites used by UK residents are based in various offshore jurisdictions such as Gibraltar, Antigua, Curacao, Malta and Alderney. Can a local person gamble on a foreign site? It is perfectly legal for a licensed offshore gaming operation to permit UK residents to gamble on a foreign based website. This is in contrast to the US prohibition under the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act 2006 on offshore operators from providing gambling services through the web to US residents. However in the UK advertising of gambling services not licensed in the UK is prohibited and such prohibition will be enforced. This applies to advertisements with a physical nexus to the UK How then are gambling sites advertised? Obviously much advertising of gambling websites are made via the Internet, which is legal provided that the server is based overseas. However in the UK, there is no prohibition on advertising websites per se, as long as they don't refer to the gambling activities. Therefore it is quite common to see advertisements on the tube and in magazines for the Party Poker website, but not the Party Poker gaming operation. Has the recent UK Budget made any difference to gambling? Prior to the 2007 Budget speech, there had been considerable speculation that in order to promote the relocation of many of the offshore gambling operations to the UK, the government might reduce the relevant tax to 2% or 3%. However in the Budget speech last week, the UK Chancellor, Gordon Brown, announced that the tax for remote gaming would be 15%. As a result it is now unlikely that there will be any major shift of jurisdiction to the UK for those gambling sites.
A telephone helpline for problem gamblers set up a year ago by North Carolina lottery officials has received plenty of calls, but not from its targeted audience. Up to 85 percent of the calls haven't been from people with gambling problems, officials said. Instead, callers want to know the winning Powerball numbers or have questions about their scratch-off tickets. In February alone, about 300 people called the helpline, but 250 of the calls came from people who didn't have a gambling problem. The 24-hour toll-free helpline number is printed on every lottery ticket and scratch card, along with another telephone number people can call with questions about the games. The same confusion happens in other states, said Smith Worth, director of the North Carolina Problem Gambling Program.
Cary Police say they have broken up an illegal poker gambling hall that was housed in a nondescript warehouse and have arrested over 40 people on various charges. Acting on an anonymous Crime Stoppers tip, the Cary Police Department served a search warrant at 233 "M" East Johnson St. on Friday, March 23rd shortly after midnight. The bland looking warehouse where police say the gambling operation was located is in the Adams Industrial Park around the corner from Woody's Tavern in downtown Cary next to Happy Jap's Auto Repair. The auto repair shop was not involved in the poker operation, say police. In a report on WRAL-TV, the owner of the Japanese car repair shop said he often saw a 100 people or more go into the building. In Friday's bust, Cary Police cited more than 40 people with various charges related to drugs, alcohol and gambling. No one was hurt during the raid, say police. Upon entering the unit, Police say that the lessee of the warehouse space Matthew McCoy, 25, of Bulon Dr., Cary was found to be "running an illegal poker gaming operation." In a phone interview with the Raleigh Chronicle on Tuesday, Cary Police Captain Dave Wulff said that the operation had been going on for at least a month and that the warehouse had been hosting large poker games up to five times a week. "This was not just a friendly game of poker, this was a high stakes game for profit," said Captain Wulff to the Chronicle. According to Captain Wulff, the operation took a cut of the games to make a profit and also sold liquor to players without a liquor license for additional revenue. Wulff said there were six tables present with 10 to 12 seats at each table where the players played hands of poker. But there were no other gaming tables and regular casino items such as slot machines or roulette tables were not present, Wulff said. According to a report on WRAL-TV, over $20,000 in cash was siezed from the operation. Although many folks play poker for fun, the operator crossed the line when it was turned into a for profit business, said the police.
"While we realize and appreciate that many friends and neighbors enjoy playing cards and other games in good fun as part of their recreational activities, doing so for money simply isn't legal in our state," Wulff said in a statement to the media.
Police cited NC General Statute 14-292 which says, "any person or organization that operates any game of chance or any person who plays at or bets on any game of chance at which any money, property or other thing of value is bet, whether the same be in stake or not, shall be guilty of a class 2 misdemeanor."
The warehouse lessee Matthew McCoy was charged with several misdemeanor charges including one count of gambling, one count of possession for sale of any alcoholic beverage without permits and one count of unauthorized possession of liquor.
The Cary Police also say that one of the players present was arrested on drug charges. William Tillman, 45, of Valley Ct., Raleigh, was charged with one count each of possession of drug paraphernalia, possession of marijuana, and gambling.
Thirty-nine other men and women from around the Triangle and state were charged with a single gambling charge (listed below).
"We were prepared for anything, given that the tip we received suggested that we might encounter weapons, drugs, and large amounts of cash," said Captain Dave Wulff in a media statement about the bust. "Thanks to the assistance of our partnering agencies Alcohol Law Enforcement, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, the Wake County District Attorney's Office and the National Guard RAID unit, we were able to halt the illegal activity without incident."
The Cary Police also said that heroin was found at the scene, but could not be linked to any of the arrestees, so no one was charged with possession of it.
The Cary Police said that the gambling violations, alcohol violations, possession of drug paraphernalia, and possession of marijuana charges are all class 2 misdemeanors. A class 2 misdemeanor carries a maximum of 1 to 60 days in jail, a fine and court costs.
The following people were each charged with just one class 2 misdemeanor charge of gambling:
Joint Release from Salvation Army and Methodist Church Ahead of Gambling Vote
In advance of Wednesday's votes in Parliament on the geographical distribution of casino premises licences, The Salvation Army and the Methodist Church have re-stated their general concerns relating to increased gambling opportunities, particularly the potentially devastating effects on the vulnerable. 'Evidence suggests that the new casinos, the increasing popularity of online gambling and the general drift towards the "normalisation" of gambling within British culture, could result in many more people developing a serious gambling addiction over an extended period. We are not convinced that increasing gambling opportunities is a good thing for our nation and all of us who live here,' said Alison Jackson, Secretary for Parliamentary and Political Affairs for the Methodist Church. The 'super casino' will house up to 1,250 highly addictive unlimited jackpot machines. The other 16 new casinos will be larger than anything currently operating in the UK. While the Methodist Church and The Salvation Army have welcomed the Government's recognition of the need for protection under the Act for vulnerable people and children, they believe there are still some fundamental issues to be addressed in this debate. 'The Salvation Army and the Methodist Church would have preferred to see no new casinos allowed under the Gambling Act 2005. We therefore welcome any debate which allows space for a further consideration of the overall impact of increased gambling opportunities,' said Captain Matt Spencer, of The Salvation Army. It is estimated that there are already around 400,000 problem gamblers in the UK and the super casino will house some of the most addictive forms of gambling. Problem gambling can result in relationship breakdown, financial ruin, homelessness and in extreme cases, suicide. Its effects are far-reaching, impacting not only the individual gambler, but also their family, friends, and the wider community. The Salvation Army and the Methodist Church campaigned during the passage of the Gambling Bill, requesting greater measures to protect children and vulnerable people The Gambling Act includes provision for the proper monitoring of the effects of these increased gambling opportunities and the two Churches have recently reminded the government of the need to keep to its commitments to properly evaluate the effects of the new casinos, wherever they may be sited.
The minimum casino evaluation period of three years must be measured from the opening of the new casinos, rather than from the awarding of the licences, as there could be a considerable amount of time between the license being awarded and the casino actually opening.
The Salvation Army is an international Christian church and registered charity working in 111 countries worldwide and is one of the largest, most diverse providers of social welfare in the world.
The Methodist Church is the third-largest Christian church in Great Britain, with over 300,000 members and regular contact with 1 million more people. It has over 6,000 churches in Great Britain, and also maintains links with other Methodist churches totalling a worldwide membership of 70 million.
The Kansas House has approved a measure that would allow casinos and slot machines at dog and horse tracks. The 64-58 vote this mornign gives supporters of expanded gambling the hope that they could end 15 years of legislative failures. The measure now heads to the Senate. Backers of the measure say the state eventually could realize 200 million dollars a year from the hotel-and-casino complexes and tracks with slots. The bill would permit large tourist-attracting casinos in Ford County, Wyandotte County, either Sedgwick or Sumner county, and either Crawford or Cherokee counties. It also would allow 22-hundred slot machines initially, at Wichita Greyhound Park; the Woodlands in Kansas City, Kansas, and the now-closed Camptown Greyhound Park, in Frontenac. The Senate will either okay the measure or send it to a committee before sending the bill to Governor Sebelius to sign. One Wichita lawmaker thinks the gambling bill has a good shot at becoming law. "(The Senate) is within a few votes of being able to approve this," says Representative Jason Watkins, a Wichita Republican, "and I think you'll just have to see how the negotiations go with the senators. We may have a bill to send to the governor." If the bill is approved, Sedgwick County would have 180 days to have voters approve or reject a destination casino. If Sedgwick County gets a casino, 22% of profits would go to the state. The county would get two percent, while neighboring Sumner County would get one percent. The bill also requires two percent to be put towards gambling addiction treatment programs.
Most callers to N.C. gambling helpline want lottery information, not help
RALEIGH, N.C. It's a lottery helpline set up to counsel those with gambling problems. But most callers have different needs. Like what are the winning Powerball numbers? And can you help me with this scratch-off ticket? The 24-hour phone number -- 877-718-5543 -- is printed on every North Carolina Education Lottery ticket and scratch card. The Problem Gambling Helpline is also repeated on T-V and radio ads. Even so, up to 85 percent of callers during the lottery's first year didn't ask for help for problem gambling. Of some 300 calls to the helpline last month, more than 250 were screened out as not having a gambling problem. Smith Worth is director of the state's Problem Gambling Program. He's not worried about the misuse, noting that other state lotteries report the same confusion.
Citing a proliferation of illegal video gambling machines, members of a key Senate committee are considering a crackdown on bars, truck stops, clubs and other retailers caught with the devices. The plan developed by Senate Republican leaders would be the legislature's first significant step toward rooting out the tens of thousands of machines that operate under names like Cherry Master and Pot O' Gold. "They're everywhere, and they're growing in numbers," said Senate President Pro Tem David Long, R-Fort Wayne, one of the plan's authors. But the proposal comes as bar owners and some other lawmakers are pushing to legalize the machines, regulate them and tax their earnings. Long postponed a vote on the proposal yesterday in the Rules Committee he chairs, saying members needed more time to learn about the issue and consider their options. "I wanted to start a discussion and see if there is something we can do about this," he said. The committee is considering an amendment to House Bill 1510, a charity gambling regulation measure. The amendment would provide nearly $2 million for 25 police officers who would be dedicated to investigating illegal gambling. The measure also would increase the criminal penalties for people charged a second time with promoting professional gambling. It also would authorize the state to revoke lottery contracts, retail merchant permits and state licenses that allow the sale of tobacco and alcohol held by any company or organization found with illegal gambling machines. There also would be administrative and regulatory penalties for illegal gambling, which would take the issue out of the hands of county prosecutors, who are often reluctant to take on illegal gambling cases. Currently, the Indiana State Excise Police raid bars, clubs and restaurants to shut down illegal machines, which puts the establishments' alcoholic beverage permits in jeopardy. Last year, excise police cited 435 gambling-related violations and seized computer chips from about 1,600 illegal video gambling machines. But excise police Superintendent Alex Huskey told the committee yesterday that the effort has driven many of the machines into truck stops and other retailers that don't have alcohol permits. That makes it more difficult for law enforcement to act without cooperation from a prosecutor. Huskey said hiring more excise police officers and giving the Alcohol and Tobacco Commission the authority to take away a retailer's ability to sell cigarettes would be significant changes. "This is a different approach," said Sen. Jim Merritt, R-Indianapolis.
James Maida, president of Gaming Laboratories International, told the committee that illegal gambling machines can be manipulated to make maximum profits for owners and pay out little in prizes to players.
"These games are methodically taking players' money in a way that isn't fair," said Maida, whose company tests legal slot machines and other gaming devices for Indiana and other states, and in nations around the world.
Maida's staff accompanied the excise police on visits to several bars and clubs to teach the officers how to recognize an illegal machine and disarm it. He said the staff found that most of the machines pay out 50 percent to 70 percent of the money that is gambled in winnings to players. That contrasts with legal slot machines at casinos, which are required by law to pay out at least 80 percent of their take and typically pay more than 90 percent.
Maida told the committee that Indiana's struggle to deal with the machines is not unique and that dozens of states are considering similar questions. Some opt to crack down on the illegal machines to eliminate them, he said, while others legalize and regulate video gambling.
For years, Indiana lawmakers have been debating the legalization issue. Last week, Don Marquardt, president of the Indiana Licensed Beverage Association, urged a Senate committee considering a bill that would put slot machines at racetracks to remember that bar owners need help as well.
"Please consider an amendment to address our problems," he told the committee.
Sen. Bob Meeks, R-LaGrange, said then that he appreciated the plight of local bar owners and fraternal clubs and told the Tax and Fiscal Policy Committee that lawmakers need to make up their minds about the machines.
"We've got to make them legal or make them illegal," he said.
A gambling-watchdog agency, always worried that adults are falling into dependence on wagering, is seeing unmistakable signs that adolescents are in even worse peril. The New York State Council on Problem Gambling is about to publish results of a study that says that, whereas in 1998, 4 percent of teenagers were at risk to become addicted to gambling, in 2007, 20 percent are. That astonishing leap is attributable to a number of factors, Assistant Executive Director Mariangela Millea told the Press-Republican last week. First of all, what is a "problem gambler?" To the council, it is anyone for whom gambling adversely affects his or her life. With adolescents, it might be manifest in spending their lunch money to gamble or missing school, for example. Eventually, their behavior would get out of control to feed their habit. Some of the factors that compound gambling problems are: Gambling isn't stigmatized, the way drinking and drugs are. Says Millea, "Go into a classroom and ask how many kids have had a drink or taken a drug in the past month, and no hands will go up. Ask how many have bought a lottery ticket, and lots of hands will go up." Society imposes little shame on gambling. Opportunities to gamble have proliferated over the past decade. The state lottery and Mega-Millions are widely advertised. Video gaming machines are growing in popularity and are now in sites all over the state. Texas Hold 'Em has gained a foothold. And Internet gambling is available, with participants merely having to state that they are of age to gain access. Lottery tickets are now available from vending machines, which have no oversight for the age of the purchaser. In effect, anyone is welcome to play the games. Millea says scratch-off tickets are by far the most popular forms of gambling for kids. "Parents will buy their kids a scratch-off, and when they win, everybody will be excited for them - hooray! You won!" No stigma there. The council is trying to get the consequences of gambling entered into the curriculum of public schools so the dangers will be widely known, as the dangers of drugs, drinking and sex are now known. The council has asked newspapers across the state to publish its problem-gambling hotline daily with the winning lottery numbers. The Press-Republican has been doing that for several weeks and will continue to do it. Millea is right: Gambling is broadly accepted, in its moderate forms. The lottery, church bingo and office pools are seen as harmless - even beneficial - pastimes, in most circles. But even people who see gambling that way would have to admit that when kids are targeted, it's time for action. If adolescent gambling has grown so explosively - multiplied five times in nine years - we need to respect the danger of this not-so-harmless diversion.
Lottery's gambling helpline callers don't usually need help
A telephone helpline for problem gamblers set up a year ago by North Carolina lottery officials has received plenty of calls, but not from its targeted audience. Up to 85 percent of the calls haven't been from people with gambling problems, officials said. Instead, callers want to know the winning Powerball numbers or have questions about their scratch-off tickets. In February alone, about 300 people called the helpline but 250 of the calls came from people who didn't have a gambling problem. The 24-hour toll-free helpline number is printed on every lottery ticket and scratch card, along with another telephone number people can call with questions about the games. The same confusion happens in other states, said Smith Worth, director of the North Carolina Problem Gambling Program.
The International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) has moved swiftly to reduce the likelihood of gambling scandals besetting their sport after allegations that the death of Pakistan Cricket coach Bob Woolmer was related to the gambling underworld. Speaking at the World Cross-Country Championships in Mombasa, Kenya, the association voted to "forbid officials, athletes, their representatives, managers, coaches, meeting organisers and trainers from taking part, either directly or indirectly in betting, gambling and similar events or transactions connected with athlete competitions under the rules of the IAAF or its members" In addition, it will also prohibit those in the sport from "having active stakes in companies, concerns, partnerships, joint ventures or other organisations that promote, broker, arrange or conduct such events or transactions". The move comes soon after the launch of athleticbet.com, a gambling website launched in January specialising in betting for Athletics. The website is owned by the Austrian agent Robert Wagner, who can count former Olympic champion Colin Jackson as a former client. Wagner set up the website in order to make the sport more exciting and donates a quarter of the website's profits to the IAAF's charitable foundation. It will be interesting to see how the IAAF deals with Wagner's side-business, as some of his clients include IAAF members. Though there doesn't seem to be much more of a future in the website, especially as Wagner took bets on races involving his own clients, he remains defiant. "I have been expecting this and I understand the IAAF's position. I will just not be an agent any more. I will sit down with the IAAF and find a solution. They cannot stop me from running a betting website," Wagner declared.
Online Gambling: NETeller pulls out of Canada and Turkey
The online gambling industry woke up this morning to learn that online money transfer Giant NETeller has decided to withdraw "no pun intended" from the Canadian and Turkish markets. Here is a statement the company's board released to the London Stock Exchange: The NETELLER Plc Group ("NETELLER" or the "Group") (LSE: NLR), the leading global independent online money transfer business, today announced several significant changes to its services in a number of markets. The Group continually assesses the risk profile and status of the markets its serves. Recent actions by regulators, payment processors, and online gaming operators have increased the uncertainty around certain activities related to online gambling in some jurisdictions. The Board of Directors of the Company reached a decision, on 25 March 2007, that the risk to the Group's ongoing business in Canada and Turkey has increased in the light of such developments. The Board has therefore concluded that the Group will no longer process transfers related to online gambling sites on behalf of Canada or Turkey resident customers.
Tourist-attracting casinos and slot machines at race tracks were a step closer to reality when the House gave first-round approval to the idea after more than a dozen hours of sometimes contentious and emotional debate. The 65-50 vote before dawn Saturday advanced the bill to final action, scheduled for Monday. House Speaker Melvin Neufeld, R-Ingalls, a gambling opponent, said he thinks the votes will hold to send the measure to the Senate. A bipartisan coalition proposal called for state-owned casinos in Wyandotte County, Sedgwick County and either Crawford or Cherokee county, plus 2,200 slot machines distributed among three race tracks with wagering, the Woodlands in Kansas City, Wichita Greyhound Park and the now-closed Camptown Greyhound Park in Frontenac. After the coalition plan emerged, lawmakers lined up to offer some 50 amendments, with all but a few voted down. Successful amendments permitted Dodge City to have a casino and allowed the casino in south-central Kansas to be in either Sedgwick or Sumner county. A third extended a moratorium on additional casinos or slots at the tracks from 15 years to 25 years. All casino locations would have to be approved by voters in the county in which they're located. Supporters said the state eventually could realize $200 million a year from the casinos and tracks, though it would be about three years before the casinos would be running. Slots at the tracks could be a reality within a year. 12-hour debate House Majority Leader Ray Merrick wasn't surprised by a debate on the bill, which started at 2 p.m. Friday and ended about 2:30 a.m. Saturday. "You can't tell people they can't run amendments," said Merrick, R-Stilwell. "It shows people had strong feelings." Many amendments were seen as efforts to weigh the bill down and the flurry of proposals irritated some lawmakers as the night grew late. "As good as these amendments are, this is about gaming," said Rep. Tim Owens, R-Overland Park. "We don't need to sit here all night and listen to everybody's favorite topics." The coalition offered its 98-page plan as an amendment to a Senate-passed bill extending the Kansas Lottery, which is due for renewal this year. Attaching a gambling measure to a Senate bill means the chamber could quickly accept it or resolve the issue in a House-Senate negotiating committee. Supporters noted that Kansans already are gambling. Besides the lottery and wagering at race tracks, there are casinos in Kansas City, Mo., and tribal casinos in Oklahoma near the state line. Also, there are four American Indian casinos in northeast Kansas.
"It provides a revenue stream for things the state needs. It provides a leisure activity for a lot of our folks and it keeps money in Kansas," said Rep. Charles Roth, R-Salina, one of the backers of the coalition plan.
But other House members questioned whether the bill is constitutional, because the Kansas Constitution requires such gambling to be state-owned and operated and private developers would be involved under the plan.
They also said casinos and slots at the tracks would create more gambling addicts - and more broken and bankrupt families.
The European Commission has warned German regions to think about revising plans to ban online gambling or face possible legal action, an official at the EU's executive arm said last week. This current action is the latest in string of heated clashes between Brussels and European Union countries over the gambling industry, which is limited to state-controlled monopolies in several EU countries. EU Industry Commissioner Guenter Verheugen wrote to German regional state governments on Friday, giving them a month to amend a draft agreement on the issue, the EU official stated, verifying earlier reports by Reuters. 'We asked Germany to reconsider the total ban on lottery and sports betting on the Internet. We think a proposed total ban is disproportionate and there are less restrictive measures, such as mandatory prior registration and strict guarantees on identification,' the Commission official said. Britain and Austria, two countries with thriving online gaming industries, have already contested the ban.
The extent to which the 2007 Budget took the UK gambling industry and investors by surprise cannot be underestimated. Only a week before Budget day the Daily Telegraph had proudly trumpeted; "In a surprise move, the Chancellor will use the Budget to announce that in return for a small amount of tax - possibly as low as 2pc or 3pc - companies can obtain a UK licence and still remain based overseas. The new tax will be called Remote Gaming Duty. This compromise would allow gambling companies to avoid British VAT." John O'Reilly, the head of online gambing at Ladbrokes was quoted as saying that he was pleased with the deal, which he described as "quite a breakthrough," whilst Clive Hawkswood, the chief executive of the Remote-Gambling Authority, justified a low rate of tax on the grounds that "these companies have grown up in zero tax jurisdictions. They operate on very thin profit margins. A 15pc gambling duty would wipe out half the industry overnight." Unfortunately for Hawkswood, a 15pc gambling duty is eactly what the 2007 Budget delivered up, alongside a new top rate of 50% for casinos.
Gambling winnings include winnings from lotteries, raffles and sweepstakes, and proceeds from wagers. Gambling winnings from charity-sponsored events are also includable in gross income. You may or may not receive Form W-2G depending on the type of gambling, the amount of gambling winnings, and generally the ratio of the winnings to the wager. Gambling winnings are reported on line 21 (Other income) of Form 1040. The amount to report on line 21 is your gross winnings less the cost of placing the related winning bet or wager. You cannot net gambling losses against gambling winnings and report the net amount on line 21. If you have gambling losses, you may be able to claim them as a miscellaneous itemized deduction on Schedule A, but only to the extent of gambling winnings. "Professional gamblers" have a different set of rules to follow. Bernie, Brooklyn, N.Y.: Under what circumstances would I be subject to a 10% tax penalty on a distribution from a Health Savings Account? After all, I am using the distribution proceeds for paying medical bills.
Gov. Joe Manchin has signed the bill allowing local option elections for table game gambling in the state's four counties with racetrack casinos, but the debate is not over yet. Manchin signed the bill Wednesday, one day after the Ohio County Commission scheduled a special election for Saturday, June 9, to allow voters to decide whether to allow Wheeling Island Racetrack and Gaming Center to have blackjack, poker, roulette, craps and similar games. Mountaineer Race Track & Gaming Center in Hancock County will petition the Hancock County Commission at its April 5 meeting for a special election in early June, spokeswoman Tamara Cronin told The Associated Press. The state has two other tracks that could ask their county commissions for elections. Both, however, are in areas where the push for gambling is not as strong as in the Northern Panhandle. The West Virginia Family Foundation plans to go to court to stop the Ohio County election and to overturn the law, which the Legislature approved at its regular session this year. "We're putting the pieces together now," Kevin McCoy, executive director, told the AP. "We're pretty much ready to go forward." The West Virginia Family Foundation says the Legislature did not have the legal authority to enact a bill to allow local option elections for table games. That requires a constitutional amendment voted on by the whole state, the foundation says. We have our doubts about the gambling bill, partly for constitutional reasons and partly because it solidifies state government's reliance on gambling even more. Unless the four racetrack casinos develop some awesome business plans, this is an arms race West Virginia cannot win if Pennsylvania, Ohio and Kentucky jump into casino gambling. If West Virginia loses, it has a big hole in its state budget. What started in 1984 as a state lottery offering scratch-off tickets only has developed into a system that wants to emulate Las Vegas or Atlantic City. If the Family Foundation pursues its lawsuit, the debate over casino gambling definitely will not be over until the Supreme Court renders its judgment. And if the court rules against the new law, it will be back in the Legislature soon after. So keep watching. This one's not over yet.
Online Gambling Payment Processor Neteller Announces Plans to Return Funds
Payment processing company for the online gambling industry, Neteller, has announced its plans to return funds to American customers. In an official press release, the company stated that it has signed partnership agreements with the Unites States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USAO), as well as Navigant Consulting, a consulting firm that will provide Neteller with operational consulting services. These new partnerships will aid Neteller in the process of redistributing frozen funds to its former US customers. The agreement was officially signed on March 20, 2007, and will outline the terms and a timeline under which Neteller will organize the release of funds. The specific details are planned to be released within the next 75 days, however, in the interim, Navigant will provide a report to the USAO on the group's current financial situation. Neteller's CEO and President, Ron Martin, said, "We continue to be committed to returning funds to our US customers and working with the US Attorney's Office." "Progress, while not always visible to the outside observer, has been steady and these agreements mark a milestone in the process," he added. Back in January, Neteller founders John Lefebvre and Stephen Lawrence were arrested on a charge of conspiracy to transfer funds with the intent to promote illegal gambling.
Half of work web traffic is porn, gambling, downloads and webmail
Nearly half of web traffic that passes through corporate infrastructure is not related to work activities, according to a new study. The research carried out by web security firm ScanSafe found that 49 per cent of traffic that employees generated concerned mostly gambling, music downloads, porn and people checking their webmail. The authors of the report said that of traffic blocked by the company's filtering service, 14 per cent were for advertising and promotion, 12 per cent were to online chat sites and instant messaging applications. The company also found that blocks to gambling sites were up 22 per cent on last year's figures. "Beyond the negative impact on productivity, uncontrolled use of the web can have serious and costly consequences for businesses of all sizes including exposure to legal liability, disclosure of confidential information, breaches of compliance requirements and unnecessary bandwidth consumption," said Dan Nadir, product strategy vice president at ScanSafe. The company reported that 24 new types of malware targeting IM applications surfaced in February, 54 per cent of these threats targeted MSN, compared to 21 per cent that affected Yahoo Messenger and 17 per cent that affected AOL Instant Messenger (AIM). MSN continues to be the most targeted platform for malware. But the study found that there was a marginal decline in malware in February. Web viruses remained virtually unchanged in February after growing 27 per cent in January. Spyware and adware fell 2 per cent in February compared to a 26 per cent increase the previous month. "Attackers know that malware may have a better chance of being propagated following the New Year when many users are returning from the holiday and haven't patched their PCs," said Nadir. "This seasonality usually corrects itself and we tend to see a steady increase in malware, particularly spyware, as the year progresses."
A bipartisan coalition proposed allowing three tourist-attracting casinos and slot machines at dog and horse tracks as the House on Friday began debating whether to expand gambling. The plan called for casinos in Wyandotte, Sedgwick and Crawford or Cherokee counties and 2,200 slots distributed among the Woodlands at Kansas City, Wichita Greyhound Park and Camptown at Frontenac. Voters in the counties where slots or casinos would be located would have to approve their operation. Casino operators would have to agree to invest at least $225 million and pay an one-time, nonrefundable fee of $25 million. The proposal calls for the state to get at least 22 percent of the casino revenue and 40 percent of the slot revenue from the tracks. The plan was offered as an amendment to a Senate-passed bill that makes the Kansas Lottery a permanent fixture, a bill that has to pass this year for the lottery to stay in business. Supporters say the state eventually could realize $200 million a year from the casinos and slots, though it would be two or three years before the casinos would be in operation. The House also considered a proposed constitutional amendment to allow privately owned casinos. The state constitution requires gambling operations to be state owned and operated. Also up for debate was a measure calling for a study of the impact of expanded gambling on the state. Although the gambling issue has been around for more than a decade, the House last debated it in 2003, when it passed a bill and sent it to the Senate, where it died. Last year, the Senate failed to pass a gambling bill and said it wouldn't take up the issue again until the House sent it a bill. Attaching a gambling measure to a Senate bill means that chamber can quickly accept what the House did or resolve the issue in a House-Senate negotiating committee. Also, legislators must pass a bill this year to continue lottery ticket sales after June 30. The lottery began operating in 1987, and state law required legislators to vote on keeping it alive in 1990, 1995 and 2001.
The push to force action on gambling began Wednesday morning when a motion was made in the House to put another Senate bill that could become a gambling bill into position for debate Thursday. The motion was withdrawn after the House Federal and State Affairs Committee sent the chamber the lottery bill and it was scheduled for debate.
It was an unusual move and viewed by many as a snub to the committee that had been conducting hearings this month on various gambling bills. Some lawmakers felt the committee was moving too slowly.
EU Warns Germany about Internet Gambling Ban, Good Sign for US
A spokesman for the EU said today that the European Commission gave an order for Germany to overturn its imminent Internet gambling ban, or to stop advertising for its horse betting monopolies, or it will face legal action. Brussels, Germany hosts a state run betting monopoly which the European Commission says is illegal according to its laws. The new law passed in Germany banning Internet gambling sites is being challenged by Austria and the United Kingdom, two countries in the EU that are legalizing online betting sites. According to Reuters, EU Industry Commissioner Guenter Verheugen wrote to German regional state governments on Friday giving them a month to change a draft treaty on the issue. "We asked Germany to reconsider the total ban on lottery and sports betting on the Internet. We think a proposed total ban is disproportionate and there are less restrictive measures, such as mandatory prior registration and strict guarantees on identification," a European Union Commission official said on Friday about the situation. The official said the draft treaty was inconsistent by banning online lotteries, sports betting and casino games, but allowing horse racing. This is another very positive sign for Internet gambling sites in the US. Earlier in the week EU ruled that all European countries in the Union who have state run lotteries, or in-country casinos, horse tracks, dog tracks, etc. must also legalize Internet gambling. The German law that was passed earlier in the year banning Internet gambling is almost identical in meaning to the US law that was passed in October of last year in that they ban Internet gambling yet carve out exceptions for forms of gambling in their own country. Beyond the EU rulings, the WTO has sent a letter to the US reminding them that they have until April to respond to their ruling in the Antigua and Barbuda vs. the United States case. The past three weeks have seen the UIGEA under attack, starting with Barney Frank offering a repeal against the unjust law, then with the EU ruling against monopolizing countries in the Union, then with the announcement of Louisiana dropping all warrants against Internet gambling operators, then with the Neteller case getting postponed and the promise of the release of millions of dollars in funds to US clients, and now this EU warning to Germany. Analysts still doubt a reversal of the UIGEA any time soon, but the facts being presented by the rest of the world, as mentioned above, may prove those analysts wrong.
Youth Problem Gambling in New York Called an 'Epidemic'
March Madness could be affecting your kid. The head of an agency that helps New Yorkers adversely affected by gambling says there's an "epidemic" of young people with gambling problems. James Maney, executive director of the New York Council on Problem Gambling. says if your teen seems preoccupied with the NCAA basketball tournament brackets, that could be a sign that he or she has a potential gambling problem. Maney is concerned because a new survey suggests nearly 20 percent of New York students in grade seven through 12 have a gambling problem. Maney said that a "perfect storm" of factors, including heavy promotion of gambling in the media and general acceptance of gaming, are contributing to the rise in youth gambling. He said the younger a child starts gambling, the greater the chance he or she will develop a problem with it.
Sevier Co. deputies shut down illegal gambling operation
Sevier County sheriff's deputies shut down an illegal gambling operation in Strawberry Plains. Deputies say they went to the Speedway Diner at 844 Asheville Hwy. after several complaints from community members. Sheriff's deputies tell 6 News that, working on a tip, they went inside Thursday night and found four illegal poker machines. Capt. Randy Parton showed 6 News how the machines appeared legitimate at first glance. "This machine right here was on a video game when we first got there," Parton explains. "And then when we discovered the remote controls that are used to change them, it went from a video game over to a draw poker machine." 6 News asked for comment from the owner, Sharon Tarwater. We were told she wasn't there before an employee asked us to leave. Investigators say it was word of mouth and regular customers who were cashing in. Parton adds, "They was operational from the time they opened in the morning until the time they closed around 10:00 or so in the evening time. Apparently, it was just from repeat customers knowing that's what they was coming in the business to do."
Three nuns have been photographed playing slot machines and blackjack at a gaming fair in Manila, Philippines, embarrassing Roman Catholic bishops. The church holds a firm stance against gambling of all forms and has announced that it will launch an inquiry and says that the nuns could face implications if they are found to have sinned. Archbishop Oscar Cruz has ordered an investigation to go ahead and will take "steps on the sisters' actions." Archbishop Cruz said the church strictly forbids people of the cloth from gambling and recently defrocked a parish priest for gambling in a casino. The photographs of the nuns gambling at the Gaming Exposition in Manila were broadcast on television, with Cruz describing their actions as "shameful". However, Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation spokesman Edward King dismissed the incident, merely describing it as "innocent". He claims the nuns "played without money" and denied the nuns were tricked into playing.
UPDATE 2-EU tells German states to reconsider gambling ban
German regions have been told by the European Commission to rethink plans to ban online gambling or face possible legal action, an official at the EU's executive arm said on Friday. It is the latest clash between Brussels and European Union countries over the betting industry, which is restricted to state-owned monopolies in some EU member countries. EU Industry Commissioner Guenter Verheugen wrote to German regional state governments on Friday, giving them a month to change a draft treaty on the issue, the EU official said, confirming an earlier Reuters story. "We asked Germany to reconsider the total ban on lottery and sports betting on the Internet. We think a proposed total ban is disproportionate and there are less restrictive measures, such as mandatory prior registration and strict guarantees on identification," the Commission official said. Britain and Austria, two countries with online gaming industries, have challenged the ban.
Gambling companies hit by losses after Budget blow
STANLEY Leisure and the rest of Britain's gambling and casino sector were yesterday coming to terms with a major blow dealt to them by this week's Budget. Rank's share price suffered further losses yesterday on the stock market as news sank in, and Liverpool-based Stanley Leisure will also be hit by the higher taxes. Rank looks set to lose as much as £8m a year extra in gaming duty after the Chancellor announced it would axe the 2.5% lower band and introduce a flat 15% tax, with a new, higher levy of 50% on casino revenues above £10m. Shares in the group dived a further 6% yesterday to 211.5p, compounding the 4% losses seen on Wednesday afternoon. Analysts described the Chancellor's announcement as a "kick in the teeth" for Rank and the wider casino industry. The Treasury is set to net another £35m a year from the move, but has defended the tax changes as being vital to ensure the growing casino sector continued to make a "fair" contribution to tax receipts.
Gambling Sites Take Bets On Who Will Father Britney Spears' Next Child
Internet gambling websites are taking bets on who will the father of Britney Spears' next child. Spears is mother to seven-month-old Jayden James and 19-month-old Sean Preston with estranged husband Kevin Federline. Gambling site Bodog.com has given model Isaac Cohen, who briefly dated Spears earlier this year, high odds for becoming the father to her next baby. Federline follows close behind, while Hugh Hefner and oil heir Brandon Davis have been named as outsiders, TMZ.com reports.
Pakistan awoke today to the news that the country's cricket coach had been murdered and their national sport had once again become embroiled in a potentially shaming match-fixing conspiracy. As President Pervez Musharraf prepared to mark Pakistan's national day, speculation was rife that the region's notorious match-fixing cartels were behind the strangling of Bob Woolmer, with former Pakistan cricketers at the forefront of the allegations. "I have been saying that he was a target of gambling mafia," said the former Pakistan fast bowler Sarfraz Nawaz. "The gambling mafia has invaded the game." Former captain Rashid Latif, who exposed a match-fixing scandal in Pakistan 12 years ago that led to a life ban for former captain Salim Malik and fines for other players, said he too saw the hand of the gambling rings in Woolmer's murder. "I have always said cricket has never been cleansed of corruption despite the measures taken by the International Cricket Council," Latif said. "They [the syndicates] were still active in fixing results of some matches. Whoever murdered Woolmer was clearly desperate or else he would not have been killed in the middle of a World Cup." Jamaican police said they thought it likely that Mr Woolmer was killed by someone he knew because he clearly let someone into his hotel room. They stressed they did not have specific suspects. Pakistan said it was sending a senior diplomat from Washington to Jamaica. Raza Ali, a former police inspector from Islamabad, said there were "three possibilities: either Woolmer was killed by the bookie mafia, by a thug or a disgruntled Pakistan fan." "No players could be involved or commit such a crime. Pakistan should send a team of police officers to assist the West Indian police and co-ordinate in the investigation," Ali added. "It is a very serious matter for the nation and cannot be taken lightly."
Pete Rose has a new spin on his gambling habit. The man who for a decade swore that he never bet on baseball, then admitted that he did so on occasion, now says he bet on every game the Cincinnati Reds played during his five years as manager. Major League Baseball's unequivocal ban on gambling is posted in every clubhouse. It's as fundamental as fielding a grounder. So why would Rose now admit he broke the rule 814 times? The only conclusion is that he somehow thinks the new story will help him rejoin the game's official family and get the Hall of Fame plaque he so desperately craves. When John Dowd investigated Rose for MLB, he detected a clear pattern: Rose, he said, never bet the Reds when Mario Soto or Bill Gullickson pitched. That's the kind of tip to other gamblers that baseball rightly fears. So Charlie's new hustle is to recast his gambling as evidence of love for his team. Sorry, Pete, but no one who really loved his team and his game would have violated their integrity repeatedly. Care to try again?
According to story, four people were arrested and 17 others issued summons for illegal gambling and visiting a common nuisance. Police have investigated reports of gambling at the carwash several times in recent years, the article said. According to a 2004 article in the same newspaper, officers found City-County Council member Monroe Gray Jr. and Center Township Constable Mark Anthony "Tony" Duncan sitting in a city-owned car in the carwash's parking lot on Feb. 11, 2004. At the time, Indianapolis police had investigated the carwash at least four times from 2002-2004, but no charges had been made and the carwash continued to operate as usual, the article said.
New 'Remote Gaming Duty' Casts Doubt on UK/Online Gambling Marriage
Dreams that the United Kingdom would become the standard bearer for the online-gambling industry were dashed yesterday when UK Finance Minister (James) Gordon Brown announced a new 'Remote Gaming Duty' (tax) of 15%, a move ensuring that online firms will not move from friendlier tax havens to the UK in the near future. In addition, Brown's new budget increases the levies assessed on land-based casino operations, throwing a major wrench into the Vegas-style casino expansion popping up across that nation. The 15% remote duty called for by the new budget is miles apart from the 2-3% range online companies cited as being low enough to make relocating to the UK worth the bother; virtually no online casino could give up an extra 12% of taxable revenues and remain competitive against firms not subject to similar fees. The announced budget leaves in serious doubt the accords championed by UK Culture Secretary Tessa Jowell, who led the push to legalize and regulate online gaming and chaired last October's Ascot racetrack summit conference of nearly three dozen interested nations. While the 15% tax is, on its face, a fee equal to the domestic levy charged to bookmakers and bingo halls, it may be part of a larger strike against gambling in general by Brown's Labor Party faction. Brown also stripped away the bottom tier of tax levels for the smallest land-cased casino operations, and replaced it with a new 50% rate - far over the previous top tier, which was 40%. The jump, affecting casinos such as the new Manchester casino (which are expected to post annual gross house wins of over £10 million), could impact these casinos' ability to become first-class tourist destinations. Efforts to explain Brown's surprise tax hit have moved in several directions. Some reports have focused on Brown's strict Presbyterian upbringing, said to be staunchly anti-gambling at its core, while others see this as a planned boost to Labor Party efforts to force the scrapping of government plans to allow the building of 17 new "supercasinos," the first license of which was awarded to the Manchester facility. An all-or-nothing vote on that topic is scheduled for the UK's Parliament in the very near future. As with all perceived 'sin' topics, gambling remains a hot-button concern. No country offers uniformity or agreement on gambling's regulation and governing. Even as the European Union has moved forward on the topic of gambling as a whole, the UK has stepped back from its chance to assume a leadership role.
State moves to revoke gambling license of Hells Angel official
SPOKANE, Wash. The Washington State Gambling Commission is seeking to revoke the license of a Spokane Valley card room security officer because of his ties with the Hells Angels outlaw motorcycle club. Frank S. Nakayama, a security supervisor at Ringo's Little Vegas Casino was seen on casino surveillance tapes wearing his club "colors" in the card room. Because the Hells Angels is considered a "criminal offender cartel," members are not allowed to work in the state's tightly regulated gambling industry. Gary Drumheller, the commission's Eastern Region manager, says the 42-year-old Nakayama has until April 6th to respond to the charges and request a hearing before a state administrative law judge. Nakayama had been the vice president and acting-president of the Washington Nomad Chapter of the Hells Angels in Spokane. The club's president, Richard "Smilin' Rick" Fabel, and three other current or former members are on trial on racketeering charges in U.S. District Court in Seattle. Nakayama is not a defendant in that trial. As a security supervisor, Nakayama had access to the office where casino cash is counted. He also had access to casino gaming chips and cards, the cashiers cage and credit slips, the accounting office and records.
There's good news for seniors who may have a gambling problem. A free national helpline offers information and resources. When it comes to gambling, the stakes for many seniors may be higher than they suspect. The number of seniors who gamble has grown; in fact, seniors have become one of the fastestgrowing groups of gamblers. A recent study found that gambling is the most frequently identified social activity among adults over 65. Some gaming venues provide bus transportation, free or discounted meals, special rewards and other prizes that attract older individuals. Playing slot machines tends to be the gambling seniors prefer at casinos, but seniors may also be found at racetracks, offtrack betting parlors, bingo games or purchasing lotto tickets. Gambling for many seniors is a social activity that affords them an opportunity for excitement in safe, friendly surroundings. However, experts say that seniors are often more vulnerable to gambling. They may use the distraction of gambling to escape the loss of a spouse or a medical concern. The attention of the casino staff may temporarily reduce feelings of loneliness or depression. Some may have financial problems they are hoping to overcome. Some seniors may have difficulty understanding that, for them, gambling may be a problem. They may be overspending and neglecting their nutrition, lack funds for medication and other medical needs or have less working years left to recoup the financial losses due to gambling. Other seniors may have limited finances and are looking for that big win to pad their retirement. It is not unusual for seniors with gambling concerns to be too embarrassed to not seek help. In some cases, things can spiral out of control quickly. One woman recently told experts that over a period of five and a half years, she had embezzled more than $250,000. Being a grandmother didn't prevent her from being charged with five felony counts and serving more than a year in prison.
Former lobbyist Jack Abramoff, the central figure in a Capitol Hill corruption scandal convicted of fraud in the purchase of the SunCruz Casinos gambling boats, may be getting out of federal prison earlier than expected. Federal prosecutors have taken the first steps toward reducing his prison sentence for the Florida fraud conviction, now set to end in 2011. Documents filed in federal court in Miami say that Abramoff has provided "substantial assistance" in a separate Washington corruption scandal and that he continues to work with investigators from his Maryland federal prison cell. But prosecutors say in court papers that his cooperation isn't over and "will not be complete within one year of the defendant's initial sentencing." Abramoff, once a powerful Washington lobbyist, and ex-partner Adam Kidan were sentenced last year to nearly six years in prison. They were accused of concocting a fake $20 million wire transfer during their 2000 purchase of the Fort Lauderdale-based SunCruz Casinos gambling fleet.
Deadwood hospital officials want the city to declare the area around the hospital as off-limits to casinos. They say the hustle and bustle around casinos is not compatible with the atmosphere of a hospital. A nearby landowner says the area is zoned for commercial development and city officials should leave things as they are. Tim Conrad notes that Deadwood already has casinos near schools and churches. He says that doesn't seem to be a problem. Conrad also notes that a change in the zoning would infringe on his property rights. The Zoning and Planning Commission will meet April fourth to consider the request to create a no-gambling buffer zone near the hospital. There has been talk of building a casino and hotel complex on Conrad's lumberyard property across the street from a hospital.
A new 50% tax on the profits of larger casinos will reverse years of favourable treatment for the gambling trade. Industry analysts are now predicting a huge slump in investment in new and existing sites and said Britain's first super-casino in Manchester could end up looking 'more like a big shed full of gaming machines' than a Las Vegas-style palace. Casino operators reacted with dismay, claiming the Chancellor's crackdown will undermine the economic regeneration which other ministers have used to justify a huge expansion in casinos Mr Brown, who was raised as a Presbyterian - a church which fiercely opposed gambling - also announced a 15% tax level for on-line gambling operators. Betting and poker website bosses have already indicated they will never relocate to Britain if faced with such taxes, since foreign countries allow them to operate with low or zero duty levels. Since Mr Brown's tax grab looks set to keep all operators away, it has made a nonsense of the Government's efforts to introduce tougher rules to regulate the fast-expanding online gaming sector. Tessa Jowell had hoped to make Britain the capital of internet gaming, attracting websites to base themselves here. That ambition now appears to be holed below the waterline. The industry had expected the Chancellor to offer a generous tax level to lure operators back to the UK but he has taken the opposite approach, effectively banishing website operators.
Casinos and slot machines are again front and center in the Kansas Legislature, and their fate - for this year anyway - could be decided Friday. Frustrated pro-gambling lawmakers forced the issue into the open Wednesday, getting it to the House floor. Debate on three bills is set for Friday. "I expect it to be a full-body fight," said Rep. Arlen Siegfreid, Olathe Republican and chairman of the panel that has studied gambling this session. Details are murky, but any plan almost cert